SituationalMITOriginal

Academic Brief

Summarises 3-5 academic papers on a single topic into a plain-English brief listing the core claim, method and limitations of each paper.

Entry verified April 21, 2026

The short answer

For non-academics writing on technical topics — ML, biotech, economics — where "studies show" hand-waving is the usual failure mode. Turns dense papers into a defensible set of claims you can cite in the post, with each paper's limitations explicit rather than buried.

When to use it

Tech and science content. Newsletter pieces that reference research. Any draft where the alternative is vague appeals to unnamed studies.

Setup

  1. 1

    Save the file as ~/.claude/agents/academic-brief.md.

  2. 2

    Needs web fetch (for open-access papers) and PDF parsing tools available to the agent.

  3. 3

    Feed DOIs or arXiv links; the agent returns one paragraph per paper: claim, method, limitation.

  4. 4

    Closed-access papers need manual download before the agent can read them.

Example

You: /academic-brief — 3 papers on prompt chain-of-thought. [URLs]
Claude: Paper 1: claim + method + limitation. Paper 2: same. Paper 3: contrarian — worth citing.

Source & attribution

Author
Bryan Collins
Licence
MIT
Type
Original

Original pattern published under MIT — attribution preserved by convention, not licence requirement.

Caveats

Closed-access papers need manual download. LLM summarisation ≠ expert review — pair with real domain knowledge for stakes-worthy claims.

New skills, explained plainly.

One short email when a new Claude Code skill is worth installing — and when to skip the hype. No spam.

56 skills across 10 categories, all licence-verified.